fbpx

Type to search

India Competition Body Seeks Ruling on Amazon, Flipkart Cases

Competition Commission of India seeks a Supreme Court ruling on legal challenges so it can make a ruling on its probe into e-commerce platforms


A man inspects trucks before they enter an Amazon facility near Mumbai, India (Reuters 2021 file image).

 

India’s competition body has sought a Supreme Court decision on challenges to a probe into Amazon and Walmart’s Flipkart e-commerce platforms.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) wants a ruling on 23 legal cases – filed by Samsung, Vivo and others at Indian high courts – amid claims they aim to scuttle the investigation.

In a filing on December 3, reviewed by Reuters and not released publicly, the CCI asked the court to hear 23 challenges, filed by Samsung, Vivo, and several vendors on the Amazon and Flipkart platforms, to enable the case to be decided quickly.

 

ALSO SEE: China’s Jack Ma Sees ‘Great Changes’ From AI Era For Ant Group

 

Amazon declined to comment, while Flipkart, Samsung, Vivo and the competition commission did not respond to requests for comment.

 

E-commerce sales seen soaring

The investigation is a major regulatory challenge for Amazon and Flipkart in a market where e-commerce sales are set to exceed $160 billion by 2028, up from $57 billion to $60 billion in 2023.

The commission’s investigation unit concluded in August that Amazon and Flipkart breached India’s antitrust laws by favouring selected sellers on their websites.

It also found that smartphone companies such as Samsung and Vivo broke those laws by colluding with the two e-commerce companies to exclusively launch products online.

Since the findings, almost two dozen lawsuits across five Indian high courts have been filed by some Amazon and Flipkart vendors, as well as by Samsung and Vivo, to block the investigation as they want to “debilitate and scuttle” the process, the commission said.

The separate lawsuits, if allowed, “will lead to absurdity since it will interfere with the flexibility of the (commission’s) director-general to carry out investigation in any matter.”

Amazon and Flipkart have faced criticism from smaller retailers for years over their business practices, saying they have suffered due to deep discounts and preferential treatment meted out by the platforms.

Amazon and Flipkart deny any wrongdoing.

 

Preferential treatment claims delayed

A Reuters investigation in 2021, based on Amazon internal documents, found the company gave preferential treatment for years to a small group of sellers and used them to bypass Indian laws.

The current commission investigation started back in 2020 but has faced many delays.

Most of the 23 lawsuits filed across India in the latest challenge to the case accuse the commission of not following due process during its investigation.

The commission’s filing asking for the 23 cases to be transferred to the Supreme Court is likely to be heard this week, a lawyer familiar with the proceedings said.

 

  • Reuters with additional editing by Jim Pollard

 

ALSO SEE:

Flipkart, Amazon Accused of Unfair Samsung, Xiaomi India Tie-Ups

Amazon to Boost India Investment to $26 Billion by 2030

Amazon Cloud Unit to Spend $13 Billion in India by 2030

Amazon Launches Air Cargo Service in India as Online Sales Jump

Tencent Buys $264m Stake in India’s Flipkart – Economic Times

Walmart’s Flipkart Seen Eyeing $60-70bn IPO Target For 2023

India Aims to Break Amazon, Walmart’s Grip on E-Commerce

Amazon and Flipkart Fail In Last-Ditch Bid to Thwart India Antitrust Probe

 

Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years.