fbpx

Type to search

China Misses 2023 Emissions Targets, ‘Climate Credibility at Risk’

China is well behind its goal to slash energy and carbon intensity, leading analysts say, with weak targets set for 2024 and no move to curb coal use


Solar panels are seen in front of factories at Jinjie Industrial Park in Shenmu, China
Solar panels are seen in front of factories at Jinjie Industrial Park in Shenmu, China. Photo: Reuters

 

Climate monitors say China’s failure to achieve a notable reduction in energy intensity – to meet targets needed to slash emissions and global warming – has put its international credibility at risk.

Analysts say that while Beijing has rarely missed climate change targets, it has lacked the will to cut emissions because of its focus on energy security.

China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the country’s top planning agency, promised last week to “redouble efforts in energy conservation and carbon reduction” this year after it “fell short of expectations” in 2023.

 

ALSO SEE: Shares of China’s Xiaomi Jump on News of its First EV Launch

 

China has been ramping up its outlay of solar and wind power significantly and looking to develop far greater power grid storage capacity, but analysts say China is well behind its goal to slash energy intensity by 13.5% and carbon intensity by 18% between 2021 and 2025.

The intensity rates – measuring how much energy is consumed and how much carbon dioxide emitted per unit of economic growth – are a key part of the country’s pledge to bring emissions to a peak before 2030 and to net zero by 2060.

Keeping its targets within reach would require “concerted efforts across all sectors to bridge the gap”, Jom Madan, senior research analyst with the consultancy Wood Mackenzie, said.

 

Weak targets, no move to curb coal use

But the planning commission set targets for 2024 that fall far short of what is needed. For energy intensity, the commission mandated only a 2.5% reduction. It set no new target for carbon intensity, and made no new moves to curb the use of coal – the most polluting fossil fuel.

Madan predicted that China might “come close … but not quite achieve its targets” on energy efficiency. If the country misses its 2025 targets, it could raise doubts worldwide about its ability to rein in emissions.

The country also risks a “serious loss of diplomatic credibility,” lead analyst Lauri Myllyvirta, of the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, said.

“China has long emphasised its ability to implement the country’s commitments, while criticising others for setting lofty targets,” he said.

The NDRC did not respond to a request for comment.

As the world’s biggest carbon polluter and second-largest economy, China has faced growing international pressure to show more climate ambition. It has resisted, arguing that it is already doing more than most fast-developing countries.

China’s rising emissions account for 35% of the world’s annual total. On a per capita basis, the emissions level is 15% higher per capita than the OECD average, the International Energy Agency said last week.

To meet its goals, Beijing should focus on efficiency improvements in industry and construction, and offer more financial support for companies to replace or retrofit outdated facilities, Madan said. Expanding the carbon market would also help, he added.

Officially, China’s energy intensity fell 0.5% in 2023, the country’s statistics bureau said last month, missing a 2% target.

 

Energy intensity definition changed

The gap would have been worse, but China last month removed non-fossil fuels such as nuclear and renewable energy from the equation to focus on tackling fossil fuels. China is applying this definition retroactively, Myllyvirta said. Without the change, the energy intensity calculation would have shown an increase of 0.5%.

Myllyvirta estimated that China would need to cut energy intensity by 6% in 2024 and 2025 to meet the 2021-2025 target – far higher than the 2.5% goal set this week.

Energy intensity might matter less in the future, however, said Ma Jun, director of the Beijing-based Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs. The change in how it is calculated “reflects a new reality” for China, in which economic growth is increasingly driven by the renewables sector, and fossil-fuel dependent industries will come under more pressure to boost efficiency, Ma said.

“That means carbon intensity is going to matter more,” he said.

Although China set no new targets for carbon intensity, the country’s economic growth implies the measure will fall about 3% this year, analysts said.

However, after dropping 4.6% from 2020 to 2023, carbon intensity would need to drop about 7% this year and next to reach the 2025 goal, Myllyvirta said.

Missing climate targets is unusual for China, which has made job promotions contingent on environmental progress to encourage workers and agencies to meet goals.

In 2022, China’s corruption watchdog warned that some regions were providing fraudulent energy and carbon intensity figures that were overly positive.

Pressure to comply with intensity targets also caused economic disruptions in 2010, with provinces cutting power supplies to energy-intensive industries and forcing homes to ration electricity.

Without a major boost to its climate efforts now, “meeting the five-year intensity targets by 2025 will be very challenging,” said Li Shuo, director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington.

“This year’s government work report certainly did not signal that level of decisiveness,” Shou said.

 

  • Reuters with additional input and editing by Jim Pollard

 

ALSO SEE:

 

China Ramping up Its Transition to Clean Energy, Grid Storage

 

China Dominates Clean Energy, as Well as EV Batteries – FP

 

Australia Speeds up Its Transition to Green Power – SMH

 

Indonesia Will Launch $2-Billion EV Fund With China’s CATL

 

 

Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years.