fbpx

Type to search

China’s Ant Group Seen Facing $1bn-Plus Fine After Big Revamp

Chinese regulators likely to fine Ant in the second quarter of next year for ‘disorderly expansion of capital’, once the fintech giant nears the end of a major two-year-long overhaul, sources say


Ant Group faces a $1-billion-plus once it finishes its two-year-long restructuring, sources have told Reuters.
China's tech crackdown began in November 2020 after the country's regulators railroaded Alibaba affiliate Ant Group's $37 billion initial public offering. Photo: Reuters

 

Chinese authorities are expected to impose a fine of more than $1 billion on Jack Ma’s Ant Group, multiple sources with direct knowledge of the matter have said.

The fine, likely to be imposed in the first half of 2023, comes as the fintech giant nears the end of a major two-year-long overhaul demanded by China’s top financial regulators.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) – which has been driving the revamp at Ant after the Chinese firm’s $37 billion IPO was scuttled at the last minute in late 2020 – is the regulator that is readying the fine, five of the sources said.

The central bank has been in informal communication with Ant about the fine over the past few months, three of the sources said.

It plans to hold more discussions with other regulators about Ant’s revamp later this year and announce the fine in the second quarter of next year, one source said.

A fine on Ant could help pave the way for the company to secure a long-awaited financial holding company licence, seek growth again, and eventually revive its plans for a public market listing.

Ant’s fine would be the largest regulatory penalty imposed on a Chinese internet company since ride-hailing major Didi Global was fined $1.2 billion by China’s cybersecurity regulator in July.

ALSO SEE:

Chinese Companies Raise the Most From IPOs This Year

 

 

‘Disorderly Expansion of Capital’

The fintech firm’s affiliate, e-commerce titan Alibaba Group, last year received a record fine of 18 billion yuan ($2.8 billion at the time) for antitrust violations.

The penalties are part of Beijing’s sweeping crackdown on the country’s tech behemoths that has sliced hundreds of billions of dollars off their values and shrunk revenues and profits.

But Chinese authorities have in recent months softened their tone on the tech crackdown amid efforts to bolster an economy that has been hurt by the Covid pandemic.

A fine will likely focus on Ant’s alleged violations relating to a “disorderly expansion of capital” and the corresponding financial risks its once freewheeling businesses have caused, one of the sources said.

Ant and the PBOC did not respond to requests for comment. All the sources spoke on the condition of anonymity as they were not authorised to speak to the media.

 

Ant Group faces a large fine for 'disorderly expansion of capital' early next year, once the company finishes its restructuring, sources say.

Sweeping Business Overhaul

Chinese authorities abruptly pulled the plug on Ant’s IPO, which was set to be the world’s biggest, in November 2020 soon after billionaire founder Ma publicly criticised China’s regulatory system for stifling innovation.

In the months since then, regulators set about reining in Ma’s empire, starting with the antitrust probe into Alibaba. Ma, one of China’s most successful and influential businessmen, has largely remained out of public view since the crackdown.

The regulators also pushed Ant, whose businesses span payment processing, consumer lending and insurance products distribution, to revamp its business structure and bring it under tighter regulatory supervision.

Ant has been formally undergoing a sweeping business overhaul since April last year which includes turning itself into a financial holding firm, subject to rules and capital requirements similar to those for banks.

The overhaul includes folding Ant’s two lucrative micro-loan businesses into a consumer finance unit and sharing its treasure trove of data on more than 1 billion users with state firms, a move expected to curb its profitability and valuation by curtailing some of its businesses.

The penalty on Ant, however, is unlikely to be finalised till China appoints a number of top officials at the State Council and other government bodies next year, four of the sources said.

While China’s ruling Communist Party wrapped up its twice-a-decade congress and central leadership reshuffle last month, top posts at the cabinet and government bodies are still subject to changes, which typically take place at the annual meeting of parliament in early March.

The central bank’s chief, Yi Gang, 64, is likely to step down as he nears the official retirement age of 65 for minister-level officials.

China’s State Council Information Office, which handles media queries for the cabinet, did not respond to a request for comment.

Just before Ant’s IPO dust-up, the central bank officially issued rules to regulate the country’s vast and often complex financial holdings companies, as part of its efforts to rein in systemic financial risks.

It has so far approved the establishment of three such firms including China CITIC Financial Holdings.

The central bank’s local branch in the eastern city of Hangzhou, home to Ant’s headquarters, received the firm’s application to set up a financial holding company in June, two of the six sources and a separate person said.

The PBOC, however, is unlikely to formally disclose the application till Ant wraps up its revamp, the sources said.

 

  • Reuters with additional editing by Jim Pollard

 

 

ALSO SEE:

 

Jack Ma Plans to Give up Control of Ant Group, WSJ Says

 

Ant Executives Sever Ties With Alibaba After China Crackdown

 

China’s Alibaba Announces Dual Primary Listing in Hong Kong

 

China’s Alibaba Unwinds Corporate Links With Ant Group

 

Ant Group Said to Revive IPO in Latest Sign of Easing Tech Crackdown

 

Jim Pollard

Jim Pollard is an Australian journalist based in Thailand since 1999. He worked for News Ltd papers in Sydney, Perth, London and Melbourne before travelling through SE Asia in the late 90s. He was a senior editor at The Nation for 17+ years.